BY RACHEL CHEESEMAN
SALEM- Strategy was the focus of the latest Full-Day Kindergarten Implementation Committee meeting Monday.
“There’s been a push in the state for quite a long time to get full day kindergarten implemented and paid for everybody,” said Karen Twain, Chair of the committee. “This is something that’s widely believed and researched to be a good practice.”
Don Grotting, Superintendant of the Nyssa School District, said full-day kindergarten had a hugely positive impact for the students in his district, especially for low-income students and those not yet proficient in English.
Twain said that implementing full-day kindergarten had benefits for the students at her school as well, and she said it was instrumental in her school’s winning an award for closing the achievement gap.
The committee is currently in the process of determining what it wants to include in its proposal to be sent to the legislature in October.
While moral support is strong, the lack of financial support with the current budget cuts is complicating matters.
The current conception of the proposal would mandate full-day kindergarten implementation for all districts.
A phase-in model would allow districts to gradually implement the program while gradually increasing funding over a number of years, with all districts needing to complete the transition by a set-in date that the committee will determine. Twain said the number as of now was six years, but that was subject to change.
Another option proposed that received some support from committee members was one that would trigger implementation when the state school fund exceeded 83 percent of the Quality Education Commission’s recommendation.
In recent years, the state’s appropriation has not exceeded 80 percent of the commission’s recommendation, leaving many concerned that the benchmark would never be reached.
Mickiewicz favored across-the-board mandatory implementation for two reasons.
“Unless you mandate it across the board for everybody, you wind up with segregated programs and a lot of consequences you really didn’t want,” she said. “If it’s mandatory, it’s not the first place you go to make cuts.”
“It becomes an equity issue,” said Valerie Sebesta of the Oregon Education Association. “We would see flight from districts to get the full day.”
Some members fear that for any proposal to pass the legislature, it will have to require little to no funding.
Pat Mickiewicz, a kindergarten teacher for Boones Ferry Elementary School, said “I didn’t come here to do an unfunded mandate” but added that unless the proposal was financially feasible in the eyes of the legislature, they might “never be able to say yes to this.”
Twain explained that the implementation of half day kindergarten, which took place during the recession of the 1980s, was faced with the same issues.
“It was right during the recession when the economy was horrible,” she said. “They put the mandate out there, an unfunded mandate, and everybody got on board.”
Senator Mark Hass, D-Beaverton, said that the committee should be thoughtful of, but not focused entirely on the current budget issues, because this was a policy that would “stand the test of time” as full day kindergarten made students cheaper and easier to teach, more likely to hold jobs and less-likely to be incarcerated in their futures.
The financial issue came to the fore during the discussion of whether or not the state would fund capital or personnel expenses associated with implementation.
The committee decided that the best way to proceed would be to recommend that schools making the full-day kindergarten transition be given priority when applying for construction bonds and to allow schools in extreme circumstances to ask the Superintendant of Public Instruction for two-year waivers.
Twain said that schools would have to be creative. Some solutions, she said, might not be optimal. They could even be ugly, but would provide usable spaces in which students could learn, whether it was converting spaces into classrooms or dividing classrooms in two with dividers.
The proposal would also change the compulsory attendance requirement, making attendance mandatory upon enrollment, rather than at seven years of age. As most kindergartners are five or six years old, truancy laws don’t apply, and that removes one of the major incentives for students’ parents to ensure that they attend.
As the committee moves forward, despite the issue they face with the state’s budget and the school systems’ shrinking pool of resources, Twain is hopeful.
“Timing is not great, but we haven’t found a year that the timing has been great,” she said. “We’re hoping that with the philosophy backing us and the research backing us and a little bit of funding, we can get this.”